Switched from following online debunkers to reading primary JFK documents myself...

Reading the actual Warren Commission testimonies vs relying on secondhand analysis made me realize how much context gets left out by both sides, has anyone else tried going straight to the source files?

2 comments

2 Comments

aaron_flores8416d ago

Did you notice any specific pieces of evidence that the online debunkers tend to oversimplify or completely skip when talking about it? I found the same thing when I read the medical reports versus how they get summarized in YouTube videos. Its like everyone cherry picks the parts that support their own argument and leaves the messy details on the floor.

the_hayden16d ago

@aaron_flores84 yeah the medical reports are a good example. I remember reading about the throat wound location in the autopsy report and how it gets described as "below the Adam's apple" in some summaries but the actual report has a much more specific measurement. The way both sides spin that tiny detail is wild. Also the whole thing about Oswald's rifle scope being misaligned never really comes up in the big youtube videos but it changes how you think about the shots.