5
People keep saying the moon landing footage looks fake because of the flag moving, but they're missing the real physics
The flag's movement comes from the momentum of planting it in the soil, not wind. I checked the NASA technical reports from 1969, and they explain the specific rod in the top seam that caused the rippling effect. What's a conspiracy detail you think gets explained away too easily?
2 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In2 Comments
lewis.thea10d ago
The flag thing is a perfect example. People see motion and jump straight to wind. Never consider the simple mechanics of a pole being twisted into ground. Same with the "no stars" argument. Cameras weren't set for stars, they were set for bright lunar surface. Basic photography explains it. It gets tiring when the real answers are right there.
8