9
Hot take: A talk with a fire inspector made me question our whole approach to emergency lighting
I was working on a code update for a bank building in Springfield last week, and the fire inspector came by for a walk through. We got to talking about the emergency lights in the elevator cabs. I always thought the standard battery packs were fine as long as they passed the 90 minute test. But he said something that stuck with me: 'Your battery might last 90 minutes on paper, but if the power's out from a storm or a crash, how long until someone gets rescued from a stuck car? That light could be the only thing between calm and panic.' He's right. We focus so much on meeting the minimum code that we forget the real world situation. A family could be stuck in there for hours waiting on us. It hit different coming from him because he sees the panic side we don't. Maybe we should be pushing for longer life backup systems or even a second light source as a best practice. Has anyone else had a client or inspector ask for more than the code minimum on emergency systems?
2 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In2 Comments
stellahayes20d ago
That inspector is spot on. Codes are just the bare minimum to not get sued. Real life doesn't care about your test results. Seen too many jobs where the cheapest compliant option wins, and everyone forgets what these systems are actually for. That extra bit of light could stop a bad situation from getting a whole lot worse.
1