I tried to do a double exposure on my Canon AE-1 last weekend, shooting a tree silhouette first then a sunset... came out looking like a blurry mess. Meanwhile my buddy used a Holga 120N and got this perfect ghostly overlap of a bridge and a crowd at the LA River. Guess I need to stop overthinking and just let the film do its thing... anyone else find cheap cameras work better for this stuff?
Honestly, do you think the cheap camera actually did the work or was your friend just in a better spot with better light? I've messed around with a Holga and a Polaroid and half the time the blur is just random, not artistic. My best double exposures came from a beat-up Pentax K1000 where I had to guess the overlap because the frame counter was broken. Maybe you were just too careful with your AE-1 and it froze up your instincts.
That bit about the frame counter being broken really hit me. I had a Zenit-E where the shutter would fire when you least expected it, so every shot was a surprise. You're right about the AE-1 thing too, @the_john, I think that Canon made me so focused on getting the settings right I missed the happy accidents. My best shot from a trip to the coast was taken with a $20 Holga where I forgot to advance the film and got a ghost boat floating over the pier. Sometimes the chaos is better than the plan.